The Pioneer
Member
*Havens #1 chef extraordinaire!*
Posts: 14,644
|
Post by The Pioneer on Aug 26, 2005 19:12:22 GMT 1
were never gonna agree on this are we Mr h?
|
|
|
Post by Panda on Aug 26, 2005 19:14:47 GMT 1
You're right. I'm never going to agree with you on the point of putting a 20-year old who has started FOUR Premiership games in the England team for two important World Cup qualifiers.
|
|
The Pioneer
Member
*Havens #1 chef extraordinaire!*
Posts: 14,644
|
Post by The Pioneer on Aug 26, 2005 19:16:01 GMT 1
im saying erikson should play him in friendlies.
As for the qualis coming up play carrager.
|
|
|
Post by Panda on Aug 26, 2005 19:17:43 GMT 1
But the whole point of the thread was to discuss who should replace Neville for the World Cup qualifiers...
|
|
|
Post by Panda on Aug 26, 2005 19:21:15 GMT 1
And I wouldn't play him in the friendlies, either. If Wenger doesn't have enough confidence in him to play him for Arsenal (ahead of Anonymous Frenchmen #s 1, 2, and 3) why should he play for England?
|
|
The Pioneer
Member
*Havens #1 chef extraordinaire!*
Posts: 14,644
|
Post by The Pioneer on Aug 26, 2005 19:23:40 GMT 1
uggggggggh i give up!
I already said i think carragher should play in nevilles place in the qualies!
|
|
|
Post by Zodiac on Aug 26, 2005 20:05:58 GMT 1
I've no idea how good Hoyte is. He might be wonderful but you can hardly include someone who's unproven at Premiership level in the England setup, be it in friendly games or in competitive fixtures.
Anyway, yeah, i'd probably have to go for Carragher, less of a risk than Johnson.
|
|