|
|
Post by Melian on Dec 14, 2003 12:17:29 GMT 1
Is this album worth getting or not?
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Dec 14, 2003 13:11:41 GMT 1
I'd say, no.  |
|
|
|
Post by Melian on Dec 14, 2003 13:22:08 GMT 1
I'd say, no. And why not? |
|
|
|
Post by Elmer on Dec 17, 2003 21:04:54 GMT 1
It's just a re-hash of the same stuff then there is CD2 which is just a load of background conversation between the four and that is it!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Melian on Dec 17, 2003 21:30:08 GMT 1
It's just a re-hash of the same stuff then there is CD2 which is just a load of background conversation between the four and that is it!! Ok, so the original version is the best one to get then? |
|
|
|
Post by tommy2 on Dec 18, 2003 23:08:30 GMT 1
"Naked" is far superior sound wise, because it's been remixed. It leaves out novelty tunes "Dig It" and "Maggie Mae", but adds the brilliant "Don't Let Me Down" (which was the b side to "Get Back"). Certain bits have been added or left out from the songs, I'll get into this later. When I'm posting my review, hopefully sometime next year. Personally, if you disregard that "Naked" has remixed sound, I mostly prefer the original album. With the possible exeption of "The Long And Winding Road". But both version has their charm. The original version has Spector's lush orchestration, but some of it really adds to the song. The "Naked" one has a beautiful organ solo by Billy Preston. "Across The Universe" is the other one that's radically different. The original featured Phil Spector's orchestration, "Naked" features a, well, naked version of the song. My fave is neither, I prefer the "Wildlife" version, which can be found on "Past Masters vol 2", which feats some lovely backing vocals among other things. Hope that helps.  |
|
|
|
Post by Melian on Dec 19, 2003 9:45:04 GMT 1
Thank you very much Tommy am looking forward to reading your review.
|
|
