Paddy
Member
*Pick up a P..P...P.. Paddy*
Best newcomer 2009
Posts: 19,422
|
Post by Paddy on Feb 16, 2009 18:58:56 GMT 1
*Football Pitch*
|
|
moronm
Member
Modest Mouse
Posts: 1,394
|
Post by moronm on Feb 16, 2009 19:14:30 GMT 1
Damn that Collingwood playing well. Why can't he just play badly as normal and get dropped?
|
|
|
Post by Panda on Feb 16, 2009 19:49:45 GMT 1
Prior went for 39.
Collingwood still there on 87.
482-7 at tea.
|
|
moronm
Member
Modest Mouse
Posts: 1,394
|
Post by moronm on Feb 16, 2009 21:06:07 GMT 1
Broad out for 44, Collingwood on 100, England 529-8.
|
|
Paddy
Member
*Pick up a P..P...P.. Paddy*
Best newcomer 2009
Posts: 19,422
|
Post by Paddy on Feb 16, 2009 21:19:38 GMT 1
Declaration time maybe Send them out at evening, get a quick wicket.
|
|
|
Post by Panda on Feb 16, 2009 21:29:02 GMT 1
Collingwood gone for 113.
England declare on 566-9. Swann made a quick 20.
|
|
Paddy
Member
*Pick up a P..P...P.. Paddy*
Best newcomer 2009
Posts: 19,422
|
Post by Paddy on Feb 16, 2009 21:30:30 GMT 1
HAHA, my guess wasnt too far off then.
Good timing tbh, good 1st innings score, evening session.
|
|
|
Post by Panda on Feb 16, 2009 22:21:54 GMT 1
Gayle's gone! Caught Anderson, bowled Harmison for 30.
45-1
|
|
Paddy
Member
*Pick up a P..P...P.. Paddy*
Best newcomer 2009
Posts: 19,422
|
Post by Paddy on Feb 16, 2009 22:31:25 GMT 1
woop woop
|
|
Elmer
Member
Posts: 7,318
|
Post by Elmer on Feb 16, 2009 23:43:19 GMT 1
Gayle's gone! Caught Anderson, bowled Harmison for 30. 45-1 We needed that. He goes along at a run a ball every test match until he gets out !!
|
|
|
Post by Robin on Feb 17, 2009 16:10:05 GMT 1
We need another wicket NOW!!!
|
|
Paddy
Member
*Pick up a P..P...P.. Paddy*
Best newcomer 2009
Posts: 19,422
|
Post by Paddy on Feb 17, 2009 16:23:53 GMT 1
Got one.
116-2
|
|
Tom
Member
*Of Royal Blood*
Posts: 15,419
|
Post by Tom on Feb 17, 2009 17:25:40 GMT 1
Doing pretty well are England, Windies 132-3 at lunch. Swann with both wickets today.
|
|
moronm
Member
Modest Mouse
Posts: 1,394
|
Post by moronm on Feb 17, 2009 19:20:02 GMT 1
Huge wicket for England - Chanderpaul for just 1. Attempted a drive from Broad but edged behind. 201/5, Sarwan still there on 54.
|
|
frag
Member
*Paranoid Android*
I have no idea what you're talking about, so here's a bunny with a pancake on its head.
Posts: 25,374
|
Post by frag on Feb 17, 2009 23:19:48 GMT 1
Windies ended up all out for 285, still 281 runs behind. For some reason, England decided not to enforce the follow on, and have reached 31-1 at close of play.
Was the follow on not enforced because of the pitch?
|
|
|
Post by -Big Dan- on Feb 18, 2009 15:16:33 GMT 1
There's one thing about cricket that throws me, and that concerns LBWs. Can anyone tell me when the ball has to pitch in line with the stumps for it to count? It seems that sometimes it does, other times it doesn't.
|
|
moronm
Member
Modest Mouse
Posts: 1,394
|
Post by moronm on Feb 18, 2009 15:24:01 GMT 1
There's one thing about cricket that throws me, and that concerns LBWs. Can anyone tell me when the ball has to pitch in line with the stumps for it to count? It seems that sometimes it does, other times it doesn't. If the ball is pitched outside leg, the batsman cannot be out whatever. If it is pitched in line with the stumps, and was going to hit the stumps, he is out. If it is pitched outside off, and the batsman attemps to play a shot but it hits the pad, he is not out. If it is pitched outside off but the batsman did not attempt to play a shot, he is out if it would have hit the stumps.
|
|
|
Post by wonderwall on Feb 18, 2009 16:00:23 GMT 1
England 69-2 anderson out for 20 lead by 350
|
|
Paddy
Member
*Pick up a P..P...P.. Paddy*
Best newcomer 2009
Posts: 19,422
|
Post by Paddy on Feb 18, 2009 16:34:28 GMT 1
99 for 3
Shah out for 14
|
|
|
Post by Panda on Feb 18, 2009 16:38:30 GMT 1
England should just go for it now.
Get another 100 on the board quickly, declare, and then they'll have 4 and a half sessions to bowl the Windies out.
|
|