Sofie
Member
*Nutter!*
Posts: 8,755
|
Post by Sofie on Nov 7, 2004 11:53:16 GMT 1
*signed* Sorry, but this is a load of crap and I for one, just don't get the appeal of it...  And it's far too overplayed as well.  |
|
|
|
Post by dandyhighwayman on Nov 7, 2004 11:55:22 GMT 1
It's like a second rate Daft Punk single. It's not absolutely dreadful but certainly not a 5 weeks at #1 track! |
|
TheThorne
Member
*Hillside, slip and slide, feel the pain, it's no surprise!*
Posts: 27,559
|
Post by TheThorne on Nov 7, 2004 12:05:54 GMT 1
It is a 2nd rate Daft Punk track, Thomas Bangalter of the band is involved in this record's creation. I loved it from the first moment I heard it but unfort that moment was 6 months ago at least, I just want it to go away now hehe
|
|
|
|
Post by Earl Purple on Nov 7, 2004 12:06:21 GMT 1
It is absolutely dreadful. It's nothing special, it's one line off a classic song repeated to death.
How could it get to #1 while Steve Winwood's original couldn't get higher than #19? (Although Valerie was NM #1 for 4 weeks in 1987).
|
|
Sofie
Member
*Nutter!*
Posts: 8,755
|
Post by Sofie on Nov 7, 2004 13:12:40 GMT 1
It is absolutely dreadful. It's nothing special, it's one line off a classic song repeated to death. How could it get to #1 while Steve Winwood's original couldn't get higher than #19? (Although Valerie was NM #1 for 4 weeks in 1987). Did it really enter that low?  Totally agreed with you on your first comment... |
|
Shania
Member
Hard to Beat
Posts: 3,530
|
Post by Shania on Nov 7, 2004 13:55:49 GMT 1
sh*t song with sh*t vid. I HATE it GALORE. |
|
|
|
Post by Earl Purple on Nov 7, 2004 15:19:32 GMT 1
No, it entered at #36 then climbed to #23 and #19...
|
|
|
|
Post by greendemon on Nov 7, 2004 16:08:20 GMT 1
*signed* although i HAVE been known to dance to it quite happily  |
|
|
|
Post by woo on Nov 7, 2004 18:06:34 GMT 1
No it's BRILLIANT ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by -Big Dan- on Nov 7, 2004 22:30:29 GMT 1
It's absolutely awful.
Definitely *signed*.
|
|
|
|
Post by skizzo on Nov 8, 2004 2:11:54 GMT 1
Not signed its great!
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Nov 8, 2004 8:56:44 GMT 1
It's ok,, Uniting Nations is better!  |
|
Sofie
Member
*Nutter!*
Posts: 8,755
|
Post by Sofie on Nov 8, 2004 9:01:26 GMT 1
It's ok,, Uniting Nations is better! Don't know that one. Is 'Call On Me' just a remix of 'Valerie'?  |
|
|
|
Post by -Big Dan- on Nov 8, 2004 12:27:56 GMT 1
Yes, albeit with 3 words from that song repeated endlessly.
|
|
|
|
Post by krescendo on Nov 8, 2004 15:34:54 GMT 1
Hey, It's awesome that track, everytime i hear that i can't stop dancin n singin  I really wish now that Eric re released all his other singles which did lowly in the charts before. |
|
|
|
Post by -Big Dan- on Nov 8, 2004 17:10:55 GMT 1
It's one of the most pointless tracks I've ever heard. Why bother putting that voice sample in there?
|
|
|
|
Post by greendemon on Nov 9, 2004 3:54:48 GMT 1
i suppose it's good for a dance, but yeah, beyond that i just don't understand the appeal of a so-called "song" that consists exclusively of the same pilfered line over a generic dance beat...
|
|
earache
Member
*Kylie's ex-boyfriend!*
IT'S ME !
Posts: 2,511
|
Post by earache on Nov 11, 2004 9:28:56 GMT 1
when i heard it from the first time, couldnt get it out of my head (  but then after 3 weeks i was a little bored...anyway great song and love it |
|
|
|
Post by krescendo on Nov 11, 2004 16:06:51 GMT 1
I still like it n i even search 4 its ringtone n put it on my mob!
|
|
|
|
Post by pingu on Nov 11, 2004 16:29:19 GMT 1
ugh! so fed up of it and that horrible video!  though I'm sure all blokes would disagree! |
|
but then after 3 weeks i was a little bored...anyway great song and love it
though I'm sure all blokes would disagree!