Sofie
Member
*Nutter!*
Posts: 8,755
|
Post by Sofie on Dec 22, 2004 22:18:13 GMT 1
Stolen from the Cinerama message boards:
have recently been made aware that the new Wedding Present album has somehow been made available for free download on the internet. I know a lot of big fans would be tempted to listen to it before it comes out, and a lot of you would also decline to download it as they know it's wrong. I just wanted to write and say that we're disappointed that it's happened and to ask that people think about it before they make it available on their computers.
Apart from the fact that this is illegal, I think it's actually quite ignorant and ill-mannered. Although I know lots of people buy albums they download, a much larger amount of people do not. So please don't fool yourselves.
You could probably argue that downloads don't harm massive corporations and huge pop groups and for unknown bands they can be useful in promotion. But for a small label like Scopitones every single sale of an album counts. I can't stress how difficult it is for a medium sized band to survive at this point in time. You only have to look at the number of record shops that are closing down to appreciate how the music industry is suffering because of this activity.
If David Gedge is no longer involved in making music in the future you can bet it's partly because people who download music illegally are depriving musicians like him of the funds to continue.
Thank you for being such a nice group of people. Your support of The Wedding Present and Cinerama is greatly appreciated.
Best Wishes to everyone for the festive period and the new year,
Jessica Scopitones
|
|
|
Post by Earl Purple on Dec 23, 2004 8:49:41 GMT 1
Maybe the reason some who download them don't go on to buy them afterwards is that they didn't like it?
I think they should be looking at who they gave their promotional copies to, because it's only those people who would be able to share it in the first place.
|
|
TheThorne
Member
*Hillside, slip and slide, feel the pain, it's no surprise!*
Posts: 27,571
|
Post by TheThorne on Dec 23, 2004 9:34:39 GMT 1
dont agree m8, we are the minority id say 90% of people dont buy what they download, total free loaders just through experience of people I speak to in real life & forums etc.
I don't share and never will again, I hate free loaders. OK it kinda ok if the track aint available anymore but still its wrong and eventually once legal muisc services are totally up to scratch , id say they are about half way there, we'd never have to use illegal means again.
Oh and to show my point due to terrible distrubution of the wedding present single, I downloaded it but it was only on my PC for 2 weeks as the stock became available but how many others would do that?
|
|
|
Post by Earl Purple on Dec 23, 2004 10:24:02 GMT 1
I was sharing at one point all of my Wedding Present albums but took most of them off my share list because of freeloaders.
I do think that record company sites should have their own legal-download areas though.
|
|
TheThorne
Member
*Hillside, slip and slide, feel the pain, it's no surprise!*
Posts: 27,571
|
Post by TheThorne on Dec 23, 2004 10:39:55 GMT 1
things are already improving I hear HMV UK are gonna launch their own download site, not just sharing the OD2 service which is pretty crap unless you want pop & back cataloque of major artists. www.theregister.co.uk/2004/12/22/hmv_10m_music_service/so true UK Centric legal downloads are not far away, althougH Napster try their best to support UK, they still very US biased.
|
|
Sofie
Member
*Nutter!*
Posts: 8,755
|
Post by Sofie on Dec 23, 2004 11:25:15 GMT 1
I was sharing at one point all of my Wedding Present albums but took most of them off my share list because of freeloaders. I do think that record company sites should have their own legal-download areas though. Yeah, that's what I did and also because it takes ages to upload and I get told off for uploading sometimes. Totally agreed here.
|
|