|
|
Post by lory on Jan 19, 2004 14:35:15 GMT 1
 Yes, I'm bitter...  Actually, Villa have no cause for complaint for that one, quick free kicks are perfectly permissible anywhere on the pitch, so they should put a sock in it... That said, Kanu was OBSTRUCTED, not "brought down" in the box, so an indirect free kick THAT should have been... Right, I'd done now....*stops burbling*
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 19, 2004 16:29:08 GMT 1
I agree with you totally mate, no way was it a penalty, at worse it was obstruction and a free kick, as for the goal from the free kick, I am afraid I dont agree with you. Refs hardly ever allow those sort of free-kicks anymore, it is normally, "wait til I blow the whistle" which is what he said to Villa in the 2nd half, he cant keep changing his mind! Of course Villa should have had someone stoof in front of the freekick preventing a quick kick, but in the nationwide this is illegal and allows a 10 yard advance of the freekick? Is that not what happens in the Prem as well?
I thought you were very hard done by! Wishing you lots of luck, quite a nice little side there...
|
|
