|
|
Post by Sm1ffj on Jul 7, 2011 17:45:25 GMT 1
Which of these songs in the year 1969 in your view should not have been #1, I am doing polls for the whole Sixties this time, once we have 10 winners (we have to split up some years there is not enough options on a poll to match the #1's in a year plus joint winners) we will have a last poll to decide which song out of the years 1960-1969 should not have been #1.
These are 3 day polls this time.
Happy Voting
|
|
|
|
Post by rubcale on Jul 7, 2011 18:18:45 GMT 1
Yay the one I voted for is in the lead!
|
|
|
|
Post by raliverpool on Jul 7, 2011 19:58:27 GMT 1
There is not really a bad #1 on this list. So voted for the one track that has irritated the hell out of me since I was born.
|
|
|
|
Post by Smurfie on Jul 7, 2011 21:01:55 GMT 1
Voted for the lazy hit.
|
|
|
|
Post by evansabove on Jul 7, 2011 22:00:55 GMT 1
voted
|
|
|
|
Post by PurpleCareBear on Jul 7, 2011 22:49:48 GMT 1
voted
|
|
|
|
Post by Earl Purple on Jul 8, 2011 0:33:10 GMT 1
The one I voted for is my clear least favourite but I fear it won't win because everyone will go for the more obvious Aussie artist.
|
|
|
|
Post by diamondgirl on Jul 8, 2011 10:14:29 GMT 1
voted
|
|
|
|
Post by The Moose on Jul 8, 2011 16:12:05 GMT 1
Don't particularly dislike any of these, so yes I'm probably one of the lazy ones who have gone for the Aussie.........but the Splodgenessabounds version is so much better ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by coolchristie on Jul 8, 2011 19:19:03 GMT 1
It would be funny if the same song won both 1968 and 1969.
|
|
vastar iner
Member
I am the poster on your wall
Posts: 17,466
|
Post by vastar iner on Jul 9, 2011 7:43:53 GMT 1
First song apart, every number one hit is a bona fide classic...gives the lie to people who say the charts have always been full of rubbish. Indeed every year from about 1961 to 1983 the majority of number ones were excellent.
|
|
|
|
Post by Earl Purple on Jul 9, 2011 23:32:11 GMT 1
There is one I particularly dislike in this year and appears 6th on the list above.
|
|
|
|
Post by ROBERTLEE on Jul 10, 2011 16:11:20 GMT 1
voted
|
|
|
|
Post by Sm1ffj on Jul 10, 2011 17:46:18 GMT 1
So ROLF HARRIS - TWO LITTLE BOYS goes through to the decade final.
|
|
|
|
Post by Earl Purple on Jul 10, 2011 17:50:09 GMT 1
yes but Lily The Pink shouldn't have been in this poll, only in 1968.
I voted for Peter Sarstedt, one of the most nauseating #1s ever, at least until the modern era, and far worse than g'dall Rolf.
|
|
|
|
Post by PurpleCareBear on Jul 12, 2011 22:22:54 GMT 1
I quite like the Rolf Harris song,but can see why others don't.
|
|
|
|
Post by raliverpool on Jul 13, 2011 18:34:10 GMT 1
So The Beatles two #1s got 6 votes between them. Shocking. Truly Shocking.
|
|
|
|
Post by evansabove on Jul 13, 2011 18:58:12 GMT 1
So The Beatles two #1s got 6 votes between them. Shocking. Truly Shocking. Not everyone is a Beatles fan  |
|
|
|
Post by smokeyb on Jul 13, 2011 20:57:43 GMT 1
So The Beatles two #1s got 6 votes between them. Shocking. Truly Shocking. Not everyone is a Beatles fan No they are not, but are you trying to say they are worse than all the other choices? |
|
vastar iner
Member
I am the poster on your wall
Posts: 17,466
|
Post by vastar iner on Jul 13, 2011 22:16:33 GMT 1
I voted for a Beatles SONG...then again, there was little, if any, Lennon in it.
|
|
